Pokémon Fans, Prepare for a Timeline Twist That's Got Us All Reeling! – IGN
Hey there, fellow trainers and Pokémon enthusiasts! Imagine this: You've spent countless hours theorizing about the next big adventure in the world of Pokémon, only to have your wildest speculations turned upside down. That's exactly what happened with Pokémon Legends: Z-A, and trust me, the revelation about its place in the timeline is nothing short of electrifying. But here's where it gets controversial – could this direct sequel approach be a game-changer for how we view the Pokémon universe, or is it just stirring up more confusion? Stick around, because we're about to dive deep into the details that might just redefine your favorite franchise.
When Pokémon Legends: Z-A was unveiled during a recent Pokémon Presents event, the excitement was palpable. Fans everywhere jumped right into speculation mode, trying to pinpoint exactly where it fits into the grand Pokémon timeline. We knew the setting – it's all centered in the bustling Lumiose City from the Kalos region, the same vibrant hub featured in Pokémon X and Y. But given that previous titles like Legends: Arceus involved time-traveling escapades that whisked players back hundreds of years into Sinnoh's ancient past, it seemed logical to assume Z-A would follow a similar path. Trailers teased a massive leap forward, perhaps centuries or even millennia into Lumiose City's future, right?
Well, get ready for a major plot twist – we were way off base! After hands-on time with the game for our review, and now that the embargo has lifted, we can spill the beans based on real interactions with various characters (though, alas, we can't quote or screenshot most of them directly due to those lingering restrictions). Pokémon Legends: Z-A unfolds just five short years after the dramatic events of X and Y. Far from a time-traveling odyssey, it's a straightforward sequel that picks up right where the original left off, offering fresh follow-ups on beloved characters and unresolved plotlines.
Take AZ, for example – that enigmatic 3,000-year-old figure who was so central to the X and Y storyline. You'll get plenty of time to reconnect with him in Z-A. And then there's Mable, a reformed member of the villainous Team Flare, who steps into a new role as the Pokémon professor. She'll dispatch you on exciting challenges to track down and capture Pokémon in innovative ways. Plus, a host of other familiar faces from X and Y make appearances, some with surprising transformations that add layers to their stories – but don't worry, we won't spoil those just yet to keep the magic alive!
Now, this direct-sequel setup is a big deal in the Pokémon world, and this is the part most people miss: The franchise has always been a bit vague, or let's say 'hand-wavey,' about how its games and regions interconnect. Sure, there have been some clear sequels in the past, like Gold and Silver building directly on Red and Blue, or Black and White 2 expanding on Black and White. But later entries threw in twists like time travel (hello again, Legends: Arceus), alternate realities (think Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire, where the story branches into parallel versions of Hoenn), and the overarching idea that every region and its Pokémon coexist in one massive universe. The catch? Events from one game might be canon in some contexts but not others, depending on what you're playing. It's led to a timeline that's arguably more convoluted than even the famously tangled Legend of Zelda series – full of loops, splits, and 'what if' scenarios that can make your head spin.
But here's the controversial angle: By making Z-A a simple five-year jump forward, Game Freak is bucking the trend of elaborate time-bending narratives. Is this a bold move to create tighter, more cohesive storytelling, or does it risk alienating fans who crave those mind-bending adventures? For beginners just jumping into the Pokémon lore, think of it like this – instead of rewinding the clock or exploring alternate dimensions, Z-A feels like catching up with old friends after a brief hiatus. It's relatable and grounded, which could make the game more accessible, but it also raises questions about whether the series is evolving or playing it too safe. What do you think? Does this direct approach excite you, or do you wish for more time-travel shenanigans?
If you're itching for more insights, my in-depth review-in-progress of Pokémon Legends: Z-A is now up on IGN, sharing my initial thoughts after the first 24 hours of play – with the full review dropping next week. Oh, and just for fun, I've also covered an intriguing tidbit: After 27 long years, the Nurse Joy role in Z-A is finally open to characters who don't have to look identical to the original, sparking conversations about diversity in the Pokémon world.
Rebekah Valentine is a senior reporter at IGN. Follow her musings on BlueSky @duckvalentine.bsky.social. Have a hot tip for a story? Shoot it my way at rvalentine@ign.com.
In This Article
What are your thoughts on this timeline reveal? Does a direct sequel like Z-A appeal to you more than the time-travel plots we've seen before, or do you prefer the wild unpredictability of alternate universes? Drop your opinions in the comments below – let's debate whether this is a fresh direction or a missed opportunity for Pokémon storytelling!
