Imagine uncovering centuries-old secrets right beneath your feet—that’s exactly what’s happening in Chesterfield, where a routine revamp project has turned into an archaeological treasure hunt. But here’s where it gets controversial: the town’s much-anticipated upgrade of Rykneld Square, nestled beside the iconic crooked spire of St Mary and All Saints Parish Church, has been put on hold until 2026. Why? Because archaeologists have stumbled upon skeletal remains and ancient structures that could rewrite parts of Chesterfield’s history. And this is the part most people miss—while delays are frustrating, they’re also a chance to explore our past in ways we never expected.
Chesterfield Borough Council announced in July that the landscaping project, part of the £10.28 million Revitalising the Heart of Chesterfield scheme, would be paused to allow experts from the University of Leicester to investigate the site. The initial excavations have already revealed stone walls dating back to at least the 17th century, along with remnants of a former churchyard that was redesigned in the 1950s. These findings are more than just old stones—they’re pieces of a puzzle that could shed light on how the town evolved over the centuries.
Councillor Kate Sarvent emphasized the importance of this discovery, stating, ‘We’re thrilled to uncover more of our town’s history, and it’s crucial we follow the proper procedures to fully investigate.’ She acknowledged the delay in completing Rykneld Square but assured residents that a temporary surface would be installed to minimize disruption during key events like the Remembrance Day parade and Christmas celebrations at the church.
John Thomas, deputy director of the University of Leicester Archaeological Services, shared the team’s excitement: ‘Working near such an iconic landmark as the crooked spire is a privilege, and the remains we’re uncovering are intimately connected to the church and its surroundings.’ He added that while the work is still in its early stages, the team plans to share their findings at the Derbyshire Archaeology Day in January.
Here’s the bold question: Is preserving history worth the wait, or should modern development take priority? The pause in Chesterfield’s revamp has sparked debates about balancing progress with heritage. While some residents are eager to see the square’s transformation, others are fascinated by the opportunity to learn more about their town’s past. What do you think? Is this delay a necessary sacrifice for historical discovery, or an inconvenient halt to much-needed modernization? Let’s hear your thoughts in the comments!
